Facebook Ads vs Google Ads for Lawyers: Which Delivers Better ROI in 2026?

You're staring at two ad platforms, trying to figure out where to put your marketing budget. Google Ads promises high-intent searchers actively looking for a lawyer. Facebook Ads promises cheaper clicks and a massive audience. Everyone has an opinion. Most of them are wrong.

The short answer: Use both—but strategically. Google Ads captures people actively searching for legal help (high intent, high cost). Facebook Ads builds awareness and captures people before they know they need you (low cost, lower intent). The winning formula isn't either/or. It's knowing when to deploy each.

Here's what actually works in 2026, based on real campaign data.

The Quick Comparison: Facebook Ads vs Google Ads for Law Firms

Bottom line: Google captures demand. Facebook creates demand. You need both.

How Much Do Google Ads Actually Cost for Lawyers?

Let's cut through the vague "it depends" answers. Here are the real numbers:

Google Ads Cost Benchmarks for Law Firms (2026)

The $6.75 figure you see cited as "average lawyer CPC" is misleading. That's across all legal keywords, including low-intent informational searches. When someone searches "car accident lawyer near me," you're competing against every PI firm in your market—and paying $50-120+ per click.

Why Google Ads Costs Keep Rising

Three factors are driving legal CPC increases:

1. More competition. Every firm now runs Google Ads. Markets that had 10 competitors in 2020 have 30 in 2026.

2. Google's auction dynamics. Google Ads is a real-time auction. More bidders = higher prices. Legal is one of the most competitive verticals.

3. Lead aggregators. Companies like Martindale-Nolo and FindLaw bid aggressively because they monetize leads across multiple firms.

The result: Google Ads keeps getting more expensive, which pushes smaller firms to look elsewhere.

How Much Do Facebook Ads Cost for Lawyers?

Facebook Ads operate on a completely different cost structure:

Facebook Ads Cost Benchmarks for Law Firms (2026)

The catch: Facebook leads aren't searching for a lawyer. They're scrolling through vacation photos when your ad appears. That means:

• Lower immediate intent
• More tire-kickers
• Longer sales cycle
• Requires robust follow-up systems

But the math still often works out favorably—especially when you factor in the relationship-building that happens before someone needs you.

Why Facebook Costs Are Lower

Facebook's cost advantage comes from fundamentally different mechanics:

1. Broader targeting options. You're not competing solely on keywords. You can target by demographics, interests, behaviors, and life events.

2. Less direct competition. Most law firms under-invest in Facebook because "people aren't searching for lawyers there." That creates opportunity.

3. Creative differentiation. Strong creative can dramatically lower costs. We've written about using Claude AI to manage Facebook Ads more efficiently.

The Real Question: Intent vs. Cost

The Facebook vs. Google debate ultimately comes down to one trade-off: intent vs. cost.

Google Ads Captures High Intent

When someone searches "car accident lawyer near me," they probably:

• Were recently in an accident
• Are considering hiring an attorney
• Will make a decision soon

This is demand capture. They already want what you're selling. You're just making sure they find you.

Conversion rates reflect this: Google search ads convert at 3-8% from click to lead for law firms. The people clicking are ready to talk.

Facebook Ads Builds Awareness

When someone sees your Facebook ad, they probably:

• Weren't thinking about lawyers
• May not need one for months (or ever)
• Will remember you when they do

This is demand generation. You're planting seeds for future cases.

The pipeline effect: That person who sees your family law ad today may file for divorce in 8 months. Will they remember you? If you've been nurturing them with useful content, yes.

The 70-20-10 Budget Allocation Rule

Here's the framework we recommend for law firm advertising budgets:

What This Looks Like in Practice

$10,000/month advertising budget:

• $7,000 → Google Ads (core case-generating keywords)
• $2,000 → Facebook Ads (awareness, retargeting, content)
• $1,000 → Tests (TikTok, YouTube, new creative approaches)

$3,000/month budget:

• $2,100 → Google Ads (focus on 3-5 best keywords)
• $600 → Facebook retargeting (visitors who didn't convert)
• $300 → Tests (expand what works)

Why Not Just Go All-In on Cheaper Facebook?

I know what you're thinking: "If Facebook is 10x cheaper, why not put everything there?"

Three reasons:

1. You need cases now. Google delivers immediate, high-intent leads. Facebook builds pipeline. Most firms can't survive on pipeline alone.

2. Lead quality matters. A $10 Facebook lead that never converts costs more than a $100 Google lead that becomes a $50,000 case.

3. Attribution is tricky. That Facebook lead who becomes a client probably also Googled you before calling. Multi-touch attribution makes pure ROI calculations complicated.

Practice Area Recommendations

Not all practice areas should allocate budget the same way. Here's what we've seen work:

Personal Injury: Favor Google (But Use Facebook for Retargeting)

Why: PI clients typically need help immediately after an incident. They're searching for solutions, not browsing Facebook. But retargeting those searchers on Facebook reinforces your brand before they choose.

Family Law: Balanced Approach

Why: Family law has both urgent cases (protective orders, immediate divorces) and longer decision cycles (people thinking about divorce for months before acting). Facebook helps you reach the latter.

Criminal Defense: Heavy Google

Why: Nobody browses Facebook thinking "I should find a criminal lawyer in case I get arrested someday." These cases are reactive and immediate. Google dominates.

Estate Planning: Favor Facebook

Why: Estate planning is rarely urgent. People procrastinate for years. Facebook's life event targeting (new baby, home purchase, retirement) reaches people at inflection points when they're most likely to act.

The Combined Strategy: How to Use Both Platforms Together

The smartest firms don't choose Facebook OR Google. They orchestrate them together:

Step 1: Capture Intent with Google

Run Google Ads on your highest-value, highest-intent keywords. These are your core case generators.

Focus on:

• "[practice area] lawyer near me"
• "[practice area] attorney [city]"
• Specific case type keywords

Step 2: Retarget with Facebook

Everyone who visits your website from Google Ads but doesn't convert gets added to a Facebook retargeting audience.

Serve them:

• Testimonial videos
• Case result highlights
• Attorney introduction content
• "Why choose us" messaging

Cost: $2-5 CPM for retargeting audiences (extremely efficient)

Step 3: Build Awareness with Facebook

Run broader Facebook campaigns targeting people who match your ideal client profile but aren't actively searching.

Target based on:

• Demographics (age, income, location)
• Life events (new homeowner, new parent, recently engaged)
• Interests (related to your practice area)
• Lookalike audiences (people similar to past clients)

Step 4: Track Cross-Platform Attribution

The person who becomes your client might:

1. See a Facebook ad
2. Google your firm name
3. Click a Google Ad
4. Visit your site, leave
5. See a retargeting ad on Facebook
6. Come back and call

Attribution tools help you understand this journey. Without them, you'll over-credit the last touch (usually Google) and under-credit the first touch (usually Facebook).

The Honest Downsides

Let me be direct about the challenges with each platform:

Google Ads Downsides

Cost inflation is real. Every year, CPCs go up. What cost $30/click in 2020 costs $60+ today. This trend will continue.

Click fraud exists. Competitors clicking your ads, bots, accidental clicks—Google tries to filter them, but some spend is wasted.

Requires constant optimization. Set-it-and-forget-it doesn't work. You need ongoing management or you'll hemorrhage budget on underperforming keywords.

Limited creative differentiation. Search ads are mostly text. You can't stand out visually the way you can on Facebook.

Facebook Ads Downsides

Lead quality varies wildly. That $15 lead might be a tire-kicker who has no case. Or it might be a $100,000 case. Qualification is essential.

Requires strong follow-up. Facebook leads aren't ready to sign today. Without robust follow-up sequences, you'll convert almost none of them.

Creative fatigue is real. Ads stop working after they've been shown too many times. You need ongoing creative refresh.

Privacy changes affect targeting. iOS 14.5 and ongoing privacy updates have reduced targeting precision. Lookalike audiences aren't what they used to be.

People lie. Facebook interest targeting assumes people's stated interests reflect reality. They often don't.

Quick Win: The 5-Minute Google Ads Audit

Want to know if your current Google Ads are working? Do this now:

1. Log into Google Ads
2. Go to Keywords > Search Terms
3. Filter to last 30 days
4. Look for irrelevant searches you're paying for

If you see searches like "free lawyer consultation," "how to sue someone," or "[random other practice area] lawyer," you're wasting money. Add those as negative keywords immediately.

This 5-minute audit typically finds 10-20% of wasted spend.

Quick Win: The $100 Facebook Retargeting Test

If you're not running Facebook retargeting, start with this test:

1. Install the Meta Pixel on your website (free)
2. Create a custom audience of all website visitors (last 30 days)
3. Create a simple ad featuring a client testimonial or case result
4. Set a $100/month budget targeting only this audience

This reaches people who already know you—the warmest possible audience. Even if you do nothing else on Facebook, retargeting converts.

Building Your Connected Advertising Stack

The firms winning in 2026 aren't just running ads—they're building connected systems where advertising data flows into their complete technology stack.

The connected flow:

1. Lead clicks ad (Google or Facebook)
2. Lead lands on optimized landing page
3. Lead submits form or calls
4. CRM automatically captures lead with source attribution
5. Follow-up sequences trigger automatically
6. Lead activity tracked across channels
7. Signed cases attributed back to original ad

This requires tools that integrate. We've written about using Claude AI to manage your Meta Ads directly, giving you AI-powered analysis of what's working.

The Bottom Line

Stop asking "Facebook or Google?" Start asking "How do I use both strategically?"

Google Ads captures people actively looking for legal help. It's expensive because it works. Budget the majority of your ad spend here for immediate case generation.

Facebook Ads builds awareness and pipeline. It's cheaper because the intent is lower. Use it for retargeting, brand building, and reaching future clients before they know they need you.

The winning formula:

• 70% on proven Google Ads keywords
• 20% on Facebook awareness and retargeting
• 10% on experiments and tests

Match your allocation to your practice area. PI and criminal defense skew heavily Google. Estate planning and immigration can lean more Facebook. Family law falls in the middle.

And whatever you do, track attribution across platforms. The client journey is rarely single-touch.

Related Facebook Ads Guides

Looking for more on Facebook advertising for law firms? Explore our complete series:

• Strategy & Planning

  • How Much Should Law Firms Spend on Facebook Ads?
  • Facebook Ads Compliance: Ethics Rules by State

• Technical Setup

  • Facebook Pixel & Retargeting Guide
  • Lead Ads vs Landing Pages: Which Converts Better?
  • Meta Advantage+ AI Campaigns

• Practice Area Guides

  • Facebook Ads for Family Law & Divorce
  • Facebook Ads for Criminal Defense & DUI
  • Facebook Ads for Immigration Lawyers

• Creative & Format

  • Video Ads: Reels, Stories & Vertical Format
  • Using Claude AI to Manage Meta Ads

Irfad Imtiaz is Director of Technology at My Legal Academy and Co-Founder & CTO at Ranql. He has personally helped 400+ law firms implement AI and automation systems.

Book a Revenue Leak Audit →